[ Log in ]  [ Register ]  Skip to: [ site search ] [ main menu ] [ previous posts ] Select style [ Aqua ] [ Lemon ] [ Lime ] [ Orange ] [ Cherry ] [(show/hide): BLOG CONTENTS]


when is it not sledging?

Indian flag

A blog by ©hinaman:

`Sledging Crackdown Will Make Game Boring`

Stuart Clark

As on Cricket365: 24 March 2008

Australia pace bowler Stuart Clark has opined that a proposed crackdown on sledging could make Test matches “very boring”. With the International Cricket Council reportedly announcing a “zero tolerance” policy on the practice, Clark said sledging had been a part of the game for so long any crackdown would be difficult to police.

“What is a sledge and what’s not a sledge is my big question there!!!.”

- you tell us Mr Clark. If you do not know it yourself, how can you defend it?

“How are we going to remove something that has been so much part of the game?”

- simple, Mr Clark, by behaving like adults and not school kids. Besides it has been part of the Australian way, certainly not global. It may be something you cannot do without, but there may be others who finds it unpleasant and offensive. Every situation in life has written rules and regulations and also unwritten etiquette. If you are unable to follow, then do not be in it.

“…monitoring interaction between players would be near impossible. It’s going to be a hard one to police …”

- precisely Mr Clark, which is why it should be a “all or none law”. What is acceptable to you may be deeply offensive and hurtful to another. Do not cry mummy when someone gives you back as good as you give out. Either accept everything, racial, political and personal or play without resorting to any form of abuse.

“… it’s going to be very boring for six hours if you can’t talk to one another and can’t do anything like that,”

- then stay at home Mr Clark, and indulge in everything like that, there is no compulsion on you to play Test cricket.

“…removing of sledging completely from the game of cricket… I think it’s going to be detrimental to the game.”

- wrong again Mr Clark, it has already been detrimental to the game, so grow up and play the grown ups game.”

It is an over-reaction if Clark believes no one will be able to say anything, there is lot in life that can be talked about than WUMming on the cricket field. For that is the sole purpose of sledging, to wind up the batsman or perhaps the bowler into making mistakes.

It is very much possible to play 30 hours and have a friendly banter.

There is too much of emphasis on ‘racial’ aspects of sledging, no one comments on the personal abuse. For being able to make it a racial issue will get a desired outcome, whilst a personal abuse is brushed off as ‘acceptable’ sledging. That in my mind is unacceptable. I personally will not accept any derogatory term in reference to myself, my parents or my family.

It has to be all or none. by my reckoning, to call me a bastard is no less offensive than calling Symonds a monkey. Clark says without sledging test match will be boring. A crowd somewhere in India will say, watching cricket without making monkey chants is boring.
Both have the same rights to freedom of expression.

The game has reached a stage where EVERY player has to agree that a limit has been reached and they have to show a gesture to try and clean their act. And not have top players making such comments.

Or we will certainly have Sydney repeated over and over again.

 

 

Sphere: Related Content

2 Comments to “when is it not sledging?”

  (RSS feed for these comments)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

That is fine, Miss-Field.
This is an issue on which very few will agree totally in interpretation or opinion.

Sledging by definition is a deliberate action aimed to unsettle a player to make mistakes.

That is just not cricket.
In the ethos of cricket that is cheating.
A team has to ‘earn’ the wicket of a player by playing better, not by being better at sledging.

What upsets a person is varied.
I can ignore any racist abuse, I will retaliate if any one abuses my mother. If I am the batsman and someone throws an insult at my mum, I will prove Ian Chappell right by putting the cricket bat to good use.

Do you follow footie?
I gave Zidane my 200% support for his headbutt on the Italian.
In the last few seconds of his international career he made a gesture that will forever remind us of the abuse players get on the field beyond the earshot of microphones.

The rules should not fixate only on racial abuse.
It should eradicate all forms of underhand techniques to upset a player.
Or as I argue allow everything.

©hinaman said this on April 6th, 2008 at 9:36 am

Not sure I agree entirely here.

Whether or not sledging is acceptable, I believe that some levels are worse than others.

For example, if someone demonstrated dangerous driving and put me at risk, it would make me angry. I’d feel inclined to express my anger verbally, probably by calling them a nasty name, but I wouldn’t dream of using a racist term, I just wouldn’t.

I think racial abuse is worse. I think it’s heinous.

Miss Field said this on April 5th, 2008 at 6:17 am

TOP OF PAGE